Vancouver 2010 Evaluation


Topic Area 3:
Vancouver 2010 Evaluation

Evaluating the 2010 Olympic men’s ice hockey tournament, helping hockey to benefit long-term from the unprecedented success by sustaining the positives while developing other areas

  • Television, Commercial and PR impact of Vancouver 2010
  • The financial breakdown of Olympic hockey; where does the money come from and where does it go?
  • NHL-players' participation – impact, consequences and costs
  • Rink Comparison; IIHF vs. NHL size – where to go in the future? Is big rink better for skill development while small rink enhances the show?

Managing the game:

  • Does hockey need a common rulebook?
  • Should the IIHF and NHL agree on a common rule emphasis?
  • Opportunities for European referees to work in the NHL and NHL referees work in the World Championships?

René Fasel | IIHF
Vancouver 2010 Evaluation - pdf
Everything that could have gone right in Vancouver did. What can we learn from the 2010 Olympics and how can we carry it forward to 2014 and beyond?
Growing the game is important, but the NHL and its players want more of a say in their participation in the Olympics than they currently have » more
“If you don’t find a solution [to the problems], the fans will never forgive you.” »more
Some 114 million people on the planet watched Sidney Crosby give Canada gold, the largest world number ever to watch a hockey game. » more























































Name
Organization Contact
Session Lead
Tyler Currie NHLPA NHLPA
Moderator
Gord Miller TSN
NHL
Speakers
John Furlong VANOC Hockey Canada
René Fasel IIHF
IIHF
Timo Lumme IOC IIHF 
Panelists
Igor Kuperman Russian Federation IIHF
TBD NHL NHL/USA Hockey
Brian Cooper Canada Hockey Canada
Daniel Alfredsson Sweden  IIHF